The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025 aka Martyn’s Law or the Protect Duty introduces a statutory requirement for organisations to reduce the risk of harm from terrorism at publicly accessible premises and events.
The change in legislation brings about the biggest change in over 20 years.
While the legislation sets out procedures, measures, and governance expectations, delivery ultimately depends on one critical variable, the workforce.
This is an excerpt focusing in on the enforcement powers under Martyn’s Law if failure to comply. It’s taken from our more comprehensive Workforce Readiness Guide which is available to download.
Under Martyn’s Law, failure to comply can lead to significant fines, operational restrictions, and in serious cases, criminal liability, particularly where organisations cannot demonstrate that reasonable steps were taken.
The Act introduces enforcement powers, including compliance notices, restrictions, and significant financial penalties. These powers are exercised by the Security Industry Authority (SIA) as the regulator and are set to come into force in April 2027 (see table below)
In practice, many compliance failures will originate at the workforce level:
Workforce Accreditation provides a defensible position by demonstrating that:
This reduces both operational risk and regulatory exposure by making defensible evidence easier where approvals, credentials, access and training records are connected.
Area |
What it means |
Typical Impact |
Compliance Notices |
Issued when requirements are not being met. Organisation must take specific actions within a set timeframe. |
Early-stage enforcement. Failure to comply escalates to stronger action. |
Restriction Notices |
SIA can restrict how a venue or event operates if there is serious non-compliance. |
Partial or full operational disruption, including limiting capacity or stopping activities. |
Monetary Penalties (Fines) |
Financial penalties for failing to comply with duties under the Act. |
Can be significant (potentially up to millions depending on severity and organisation size). Daily fines may apply for ongoing non-compliance. |
Daily Penalties (potentially £500 to £50000) |
Continued failure after enforcement action can trigger ongoing fines. |
Escalating financial exposure until compliance is achieved. |
Criminal Liability (Serious Breaches) |
In the most serious cases (e.g. gross negligence or failure to act), individuals may be held accountable. |
Potential criminal prosecution of responsible individuals. |
Senior Accountability Exposure |
Enhanced tier requires a named senior individual responsible for compliance. |
Personal accountability risk at leadership level. |
Operational Shutdown Risk |
In extreme cases, unsafe environments may not be allowed to operate. |
Event cancellation or venue closure until compliant. |
Reputational & Legal Consequences |
Non-compliance—especially following an incident—can trigger wider legal action. |
Civil claims, insurance issues, and long-term reputational damage. |
Martyn’s Law defines what must be achieved, not how to achieve it.
Workforce accreditation and Accredit Induct provide the mechanisms to operationalise key aspects of the Act through pre-event compliance control (application, verification, approval), on-site access control (who is allowed in and where) and ongoing assurance (valid credentials, training, role alignment).
Accredit Solutions (a Department of Homeland Security approved technology) enables:
This creates a controlled environment where workforce compliance is enforced, not assumed and where workforce accreditation becomes a critical control layer underpinning security and operational delivery.
Are you on track?
Gain critical insight or look for any gaps by downloading our free:
Or get in touch for more information on how best-in-class accreditation can help your organisation become compliant as well as strengthen it operationally.
Resources: